<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Houston Cars</title>
	
	<link>http://www.houstoncars.org</link>
	<description>Car Reviews, News, and Rambling</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/HoustonCars" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">668215</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://www.feedburner.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>GM Prices Silverado Hybrid &amp; Sierra Hybrid</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/gm-prices-silverado-hybrid-sierra-hybrid.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/gm-prices-silverado-hybrid-sierra-hybrid.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/gm-prices-silverado-hybrid-sierra-hybrid.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The soon-to-be released 2009 Silverado Hybrid and Sierra Hybrid finally have a price tag to go with the improved fuel economy.&#160; The 2009 Sierra Hybrid will have a base price of a cool $39,365.&#160; If you want the decked out 3HB version with leather, box, and rear sonar, be prepared to pony up a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2009-silverado-hybrid-logopg.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="164" alt="2009-Silverado-Hybrid-Logo.pg" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/2009-silverado-hybrid-logopg-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0"></a> The soon-to-be released 2009 Silverado Hybrid and Sierra Hybrid finally have a price tag to go with the improved fuel economy.&nbsp; The 2009 Sierra Hybrid will have a <strong>base</strong> price of a cool $39,365.&nbsp; If you want the decked out 3HB version with leather, box, and rear sonar, be prepared to pony up a stunning $45,500.&nbsp; Remember, we&#8217;re not talking about the latest luxury sedan or sports car here - we&#8217;re talking about a pickup truck.</p>
<p>On the plus side, if you can get beyond the price ( I can&#8217;t ), fuel economy is excellent for a truck.&nbsp; EPA says the 4&#215;2 version will get 21 MPG city and 22 MPG highway.&nbsp; The 4&#215;4 will drop to 20 MPG city / 20 MPG highway.&nbsp; Either way, those are strong numbers for a full size truck.</p>
<p><strong>I don&#8217;t get it</strong></p>
<p>Full-size hybrid SUV&#8217;s, I can kind of see a market for.&nbsp; There are plenty of large SUV buyers who have big families, and make decent use of the space.&nbsp; But a pickup truck?&nbsp; If you need a full-size truck ( most don&#8217;t ), then your demands will likely outpace the hybrid&#8217;s capabilities ( lower towing capacity and all ).&nbsp; If you stay within the capabilities of this truck, chances are pretty good you could get by with a small truck.&nbsp; And you wouldn&#8217;t get hit with a $40k+ price tag, either.</p>
<p>My advice?&nbsp; Save your cash.&nbsp; If you need a big ol truck, buy one without the fancy hybrid hardware.&nbsp; If you don&#8217;t need to tow 8k+ pounds on a daily basis, but still need a truck, buy a Frontier or Tacoma.&nbsp; Gas mileage won&#8217;t be much worse than the hybrid, and they can be had for $18k less.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/gm-prices-silverado-hybrid-sierra-hybrid.php">GM Prices Silverado Hybrid &amp; Sierra Hybrid</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=N8c8O"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=N8c8O" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=wcfwo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=wcfwo" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=Svmwo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=Svmwo" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/gm-prices-silverado-hybrid-sierra-hybrid.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2010 Ford Fusion</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/2010-ford-fusion.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/2010-ford-fusion.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/2010-ford-fusion.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The facelifted 2010 Ford Fusion is now official, and you&#8217;re looking at the first picture released by Ford.&#160; All you can really see is the front end - never a shortcoming in the Fusion, and it still looks good.&#160; The rear end is supposed to get an upgrade, along with the interior.&#160; That&#8217;s good [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/2010-ford-fusion.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="145" alt="2010-ford-fusion" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/2010-ford-fusion-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /></a> The facelifted 2010 Ford Fusion is now official, and you&#8217;re looking at the first picture released by Ford.&#160; All you can really see is the front end - never a shortcoming in the Fusion, and it still looks good.&#160; The rear end is supposed to get an upgrade, along with the interior.&#160; That&#8217;s good news really, because the Fusion interior was a little weak.</p>
<p>The real news is under the hood, though.&#160; Ford has replaced the 2.3 liter 4 cylinder with the Mazda6 2.5 liter 4 cylinder, good for a competitive 175 HP.&#160; Ford kept the 3.0 liter V6 in place, but bumped it from 221 HP to 240 HP.&#160; That&#8217;s a good ~30 HP below the big imports&#8230;.. which is bad on paper, but probably not an issue at all in real life.&#160; Who needs 270 HP in a family sedan, anyway?&#160; The Fusion Sport will sport the 263 HP 3.5 liter V6, if you must have some more power.</p>
<ul>
<li>Six speed transmission standard on <strong>all Fusions</strong>.&#160; This is huge.&#160; This is necessary.&#160; This is an example of a domestic automaker making the right choice on a mainstream vehicle - that doesn&#8217;t happen very often.</li>
<li>EPA testing isn&#8217;t available yet, but Ford says 32 MPG on the highway for the 4 cylinder.&#160; Nice.</li>
<li>Fusion Hybrid on the way - with some pretty wild claims.&#160; I&#8217;ll save that for another post.</li>
</ul>
<p>The Fusion has the potential to really run with the top of the midsize class.&#160; It has always had the looks necessary.&#160; The hardware updates will sure help, as will the coming hybrid version.&#160; Will Ford get the interior right?&#160; I sure hope so.. it&#8217;s absolutely crucial to compete with the likes of the Toyota, Honda, and Nissan segment leaders.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/2010-ford-fusion.php">2010 Ford Fusion</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=BJKrN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=BJKrN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=5Wltn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=5Wltn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=ttwdn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=ttwdn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/2010-ford-fusion.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nissan Versa 1.6L - Cheapest car in America</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-versa-16l-cheapest-car-in-america.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-versa-16l-cheapest-car-in-america.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-versa-16l-cheapest-car-in-america.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Nissan announced a new Versa trim level - the 2009 Versa 1.6.&#160; Stripped to the bone, this car has the lowest starting MSRP of any new car sold in America, at $9990 before destination.&#160; Before you get too excited, this car is absolutely bare bones.&#160; What do I mean?&#160; Well, you&#8217;ll be rowing your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/2009-nissan-versa-sedan-555.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="108" alt="2009_nissan_versa_sedan_555" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/2009-nissan-versa-sedan-555-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /></a> Nissan announced a new Versa trim level - the 2009 Versa 1.6.&#160; Stripped to the bone, this car has the lowest starting MSRP of any new car sold in America, at $9990 before destination.&#160; Before you get too excited, this car is absolutely bare bones.&#160; What do I mean?&#160; Well, you&#8217;ll be rowing your own gears, and you&#8217;ll be cranking your windows up and down.&#160; Nissan probably won&#8217;t sell a ton of these down south, as A/C is not standard.&#160; Long highway trips won&#8217;t be a blast either, because cruise control is absent.&#160; </p>
<p>On the plus side though, Nissan did include front, side, and curtain airbags standard.&#160; So while you&#8217;re sweating from the lack of A/C, at least you won&#8217;t die in a crash.&#160; And, the 1.6 liter engine ( down from 1.8 liters in the regular Versa ) is good for 34 MPG on the highway, so you won&#8217;t be spending much on gas.</p>
<p>If you absolutely <strong>must</strong> have A/C, it can be yours for a grand.&#160; If you&#8217;re too lazy to shift, a slushbox runs another grand.&#160; So, one might say that &quot;reasonably equipped&quot;, the base Versa is a cool $12 grand, rather than $10k.&#160; And, of course, these prices are before the $695 destination charge.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-versa-16l-cheapest-car-in-america.php">Nissan Versa 1.6L - Cheapest car in America</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=zG3LN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=zG3LN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=aNSAn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=aNSAn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=rSden"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=rSden" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-versa-16l-cheapest-car-in-america.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Nissan 370Z Official Pics</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-nissan-370z-official-pics.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-nissan-370z-official-pics.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-nissan-370z-official-pics.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No more spy shots, covered or uncovered.&#160; Here is the real deal - the 2009 Nissan 370Z in the flesh.&#160; Err metal, as it were.&#160; Anyway, nothing left to detract from the fantastic good looks of the all new Z car.&#160; Front, side, rear, all good.&#160; Even the interior looks pretty amazing in Burnt Orange [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/nissan-370z.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="107" alt="nissan-370z" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/nissan-370z-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /></a>No more spy shots, covered or uncovered.&#160; Here is the real deal - the 2009 Nissan 370Z in the flesh.&#160; Err metal, as it were.&#160; Anyway, nothing left to detract from the fantastic good looks of the all new Z car.&#160; Front, side, rear, all good.&#160; Even the interior looks pretty amazing in Burnt Orange - the door panel treatment is a nice touch.&#160; </p>
<p>Sexier, lighter, more powerful&#8230; if Nissan can keep the price in check with the new Z&#8230;. then the lack of a backseat won&#8217;t bother me a bit.&#160; This car is fantastic. <img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="112" alt="nissan370z-side" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/nissan370z-side-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /> <a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/nissan370z-interior.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="156" alt="nissan370z-interior" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/nissan370z-interior-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /></a> </p>
<p>Oh, not sure if I mentioned it before&#8230; there will again be two transmissions available with the 09 370Z.&#160; The base transmission remains a 6 speed manual ( and quite frankly the only real option here ), but you have your choice of an automatic as well.&#160; The neato part?&#160; How about seven speeds?&#160; That&#8217;s a first for Nissan, and the first in a non luxury car, as far as I know.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-nissan-370z-official-pics.php">2009 Nissan 370Z Official Pics</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=lTCWN"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=lTCWN" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=a8PMn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=a8PMn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=oqCgn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=oqCgn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-nissan-370z-official-pics.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nissan cuts profit target by 66%</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-cuts-profit-target-by-66.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-cuts-profit-target-by-66.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Nissan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-cuts-profit-target-by-66.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Unlike the domestic automakers, who are largely still in denial, Nissan is fully aware and honest about the current economic conditions.&#160; To that end, Nissan reduced its profit forecast for the fiscal year ( ending March 21, 2009 ) by a massive 66%.&#160; Their new target is $2.62 billion dollars for the fiscal year.
Note [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/nissan-logo.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="216" alt="nissan_logo" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/nissan-logo-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /></a> Unlike the domestic automakers, who are largely still in denial, Nissan is fully aware and honest about the current economic conditions.&#160; To that end, Nissan reduced its profit forecast for the fiscal year ( ending March 21, 2009 ) by a massive 66%.&#160; Their new target is $2.62 billion dollars for the fiscal year.</p>
<p>Note - Nissan is still projected to make a few billion, as opposed to the domestics, who are bleeding cash.&#160; In addition to cutting the profit forecast, Nissan is also cutting production, and jobs.&#160; They will build 200,000 less cars for the year, and cut 3,500 jobs.&#160; 2500 will come from the US - as part of a voluntary buyout program, while the remaining 1,000 jobs will be cut in Japan.&#160; </p>
<p>To cut profit forecasts by such a huge percentage is a staggering setback - there&#8217;s no doubt about that.&#160; But looking at things in a somewhat positive light, we have to remember - Nissan is still profitable.&#160; In the wake of an terrible economic situation in the US, and very large incentives across the board, Nissan is still profitable.&#160; That&#8217;s worth noting, at least.&#160; Perhaps GM and Ford can pay attention and learn something.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-cuts-profit-target-by-66.php">Nissan cuts profit target by 66%</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=WbH1N"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=WbH1N" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=gtqJn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=gtqJn" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=g8zsn"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=g8zsn" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/nissan-cuts-profit-target-by-66.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Ford Explorer Spy Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/2011-ford-explorer-spy-shots.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/2011-ford-explorer-spy-shots.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Ford]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Spy Shots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/2011-ford-explorer-spy-shots.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ We&#8217;ve known the Ford would build the 2011 Explorer on a unibody car type platform for awhile now - and here are the first spy shots.&#160; First impression?&#160; It looks&#8230; awkward&#8230; goofy.. and lumpy.&#160; The side / rear view is particularly awkward -the roof jumps up after the rear doors.&#160; Why in the world [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/2011-ford-explorer.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="164" alt="2011-Ford-Explorer" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/2011-ford-explorer-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /></a> We&#8217;ve known the Ford would build the 2011 Explorer on a unibody car type platform for awhile now - and here are the first spy shots.&#160; First impression?&#160; It looks&#8230; awkward&#8230; goofy.. and lumpy.&#160; The side / rear view is particularly awkward -the roof jumps up after the rear doors.&#160; Why in the world does it do that?&#160; </p>
<p>Really, the 2011 Explorer looks like a <strike>Freestyle </strike>whoops I mean Taurus X on steroids.&#160; While the Taurus X is a somewhat competent package ( trying to be nice here ), it&#8217;s not an attractive vehicle.&#160; I don&#8217;t think this is the right direction for the Explorer at all&#8230;. and Ford doesn&#8217;t exactly need yet another midsize crossover vehicle in their lineup, do they?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/2011-ford-explorer-2.jpg"><img style="border-top-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px" height="164" alt="2011-Ford-Explorer-2" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/2011-ford-explorer-2-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /></a>&#160;<a href="http://jalopnik.com/5067729/first-photos-of-new-car+based-ford-explorer" rel="nofollow">Source</a>.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/2011-ford-explorer-spy-shots.php">2011 Ford Explorer Spy Shots</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=tHZ0M"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=tHZ0M" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=WjBGm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=WjBGm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=ChvPm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=ChvPm" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/2011-ford-explorer-spy-shots.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aspen Hybrid and Durango Hybrid get the axe</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/aspen-hybrid-and-durango-hybrid-get-the-axe.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/aspen-hybrid-and-durango-hybrid-get-the-axe.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/aspen-hybrid-and-durango-hybrid-get-the-axe.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduced just two short months ago, Chrysler&#8217;s twin hybrid behemoths were born.&#160; And today, they&#8217;ve died - along with the Newark, DE assembly plant that builds them.&#160; There are a few thousand pending orders for these vehicles&#8230;. but there&#8217;s no word on wether they will be produced or cancelled.&#160; If Chrysler decided to cancel, customers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p>Introduced just two short months ago, Chrysler&#8217;s twin hybrid behemoths were born.&#160; And today, they&#8217;ve died - along with the Newark, DE assembly plant that builds them.&#160; There are a few thousand pending orders for these vehicles&#8230;. but there&#8217;s no word on wether they will be produced or cancelled.&#160; If Chrysler decided to cancel, customers can always choose to head over to their local Chevy dealership and pick up a Tahoe Hybrid for just a few thousand more.&#160; Or, in a more likely scenario, the customer will come to their senses and purchase something more&#8230; well&#8230; sensible.</p>
<p>Reportedly, Dodge will still be pushing forward with the Hybrid Ram&#8230; at least we haven&#8217;t heard otherwise just yet.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/aspen-hybrid-and-durango-hybrid-get-the-axe.php">Aspen Hybrid and Durango Hybrid get the axe</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=QpTyM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=QpTyM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=6Qczm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=6Qczm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=ALXsm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=ALXsm" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/aspen-hybrid-and-durango-hybrid-get-the-axe.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chrysler dropping AWD as option on Sebring, Avenger, Caliber</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/chrysler-dropping-awd-as-option-on-sebring-avenger-caliber.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/chrysler-dropping-awd-as-option-on-sebring-avenger-caliber.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 18:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/chrysler-dropping-awd-as-option-on-sebring-avenger-caliber.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ What&#8217;s that you say?&#160; Chrysler made the decision to drop the available AWD on the Sebring, Avenger, and Caliber.&#160; I think it&#8217;s safe to say that just about no one&#160; even knew these vehicles offered AWD.&#160; No one is buying the FWD Sebring&#8230; why would they spend more for an AWD version?&#160; It&#8217;s not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/2008-chrysler-sebring-ext-1.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="159" alt="2008_Chrysler_Sebring_ext_1" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/2008-chrysler-sebring-ext-1-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0" /></a> What&#8217;s that you say?&#160; Chrysler made the decision to drop the available AWD on the Sebring, Avenger, and Caliber.&#160; I think it&#8217;s safe to say that just about <strong>no one</strong>&#160; even knew these vehicles offered AWD.&#160; No one is buying the FWD Sebring&#8230; why would they spend more for an AWD version?&#160; It&#8217;s not as if the Sebring is a powerful and/ or sporty car that tested the limits of FWD.&#160; </p>
<p>No one will miss the AWD option on these vehicles, much like no one will miss the vehicles if / when they stop production.&#160; Except maybe the Avenger&#8230;. maybe.&#160; The Sebring and Caliber can&#8217;t die fast enough&#8230;.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/chrysler-dropping-awd-as-option-on-sebring-avenger-caliber.php">Chrysler dropping AWD as option on Sebring, Avenger, Caliber</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=4JkPM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=4JkPM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=rjYHm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=rjYHm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=ksigm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=ksigm" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/chrysler-dropping-awd-as-option-on-sebring-avenger-caliber.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Cadillac CTS-V priced at $59,995</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-cadillac-cts-v-priced-at-59995.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-cadillac-cts-v-priced-at-59995.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cadillac]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-cadillac-cts-v-priced-at-59995.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cadillac&#8217;s super sedan finally has a price tag attached to it.&#160; With a base price of $59,995, the unofficial &#8220;four door Corvette&#8221; is a ridiculous bargain.&#160; Wait, did I just call a sixty thousand dollar car a bargain?&#160; You better believe it.&#160; Remember, this car has a version of the Corvette ZR-1 engine, putting out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/2009-cadillac-cts-v.png"><img height="164" alt="2009-cadillac-cts-v" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/2009-cadillac-cts-v-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0"></a>Cadillac&#8217;s super sedan finally has a price tag attached to it.&nbsp; With a base price of $59,995, the unofficial &#8220;four door Corvette&#8221; is a ridiculous bargain.&nbsp; Wait, did I just call a sixty thousand dollar car a <strong>bargain?</strong>&nbsp; You better believe it.&nbsp; Remember, this car has a version of the Corvette ZR-1 engine, putting out 556 HP.&nbsp; And, you get to enjoy every one of those 556 ponies for a cool $40 grand <strong>less</strong> than a Corvette ZR1.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Unmatched performance.&nbsp; Four doors.&nbsp; Practicality.&nbsp; Bargain-basement price.&nbsp; This car is one of a kind&#8230;.&nbsp; Even in this market, with the economy in the crapper, I&#8217;d wager that GM won&#8217;t have any trouble moving these puppies.</p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-cadillac-cts-v-priced-at-59995.php">2009 Cadillac CTS-V priced at $59,995</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=twZQM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=twZQM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=DBDmm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=DBDmm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=5P7fm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=5P7fm" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/2009-cadillac-cts-v-priced-at-59995.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toyota iQ Concept</title>
		<link>http://www.houstoncars.org/toyota-iq-concept.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.houstoncars.org/toyota-iq-concept.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 10:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Toyota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.houstoncars.org/toyota-iq-concept.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Meet Toyota&#8217;s answer to the Smart Fortwo - the iQ concept.&#160; While the iQ is about a foot longer than the ForTwo, it&#8217;s unquestionably in the same class.&#160; Where it bests the Smart, however, is passenger space.&#160; Whereas the Fortwo seats, you guessed it, just two passengers - the iQ is a &#8220;3 + [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="KonaBody"><p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/toyota-iq-concept.jpg"><img style="border-right: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-bottom: 0px" height="184" alt="toyota-iq-concept" src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/toyota-iq-concept-thumb.jpg" width="244" border="0"></a> Meet Toyota&#8217;s answer to the Smart Fortwo - the iQ concept.&nbsp; While the iQ is about a foot longer than the ForTwo, it&#8217;s unquestionably in the same class.&nbsp; Where it bests the Smart, however, is passenger space.&nbsp; Whereas the Fortwo seats, you guessed it, just two passengers - the iQ is a &#8220;3 + 1&#8243;.&nbsp; What in the world is that, you ask?&nbsp; Well, the passenger side dash is further forward than the driver&#8217;s side.&nbsp; So the front passenger sits a bit ahead of the driver, creating a human sized rear passenger seat.&nbsp; The &#8220;plus 1&#8243; is behind the driver, and reserved for small children only.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be the first to say I wouldn&#8217;t want to be in the backseat of the iQ, regardless of fancy arrangements - but I like the effort and idea.&nbsp; Tiny car, presumed great fuel economy, and room for 3 adults and a kiddo.&nbsp; Brilliant. </p>
</div><p>a</p>
<p><a href="http://www.houstoncars.org/toyota-iq-concept.php">Toyota iQ Concept</a></p>
<div class="feedflare">
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=WEBXM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=WEBXM" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=KtdNm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=KtdNm" border="0"></img></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?a=Ftwqm"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/HoustonCars?i=Ftwqm" border="0"></img></a>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.houstoncars.org/toyota-iq-concept.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.175 seconds -->
